Possibly, but not necessarily. A doctor has a duty to tell a patient about any significant risks involved in a procedure, but they do not need to tell a patient about every imaginable risk. Failing to tell a patient about a significant risk may result in liability under the theory that they did not get informed consent. (This rule does not apply in emergencies, since a doctor does not have time to get informed consent.) A patient bringing a claim based on a lack of informed consent will need to show that a competent doctor would have disclosed the risk, or that a reasonable patient would have made a different decision if they had known about the risk.
Was this article helpful?
How can we improve this article?
Related articles
- Do I need to make a complaint regarding the doctor, hospital, health care provider or medical provider who committed medical malpractice or negligence and injured or hurt me?
- Before filing my medical malpractice or negligence case/lawsuit, do I have to give notice to the doctor, hospital, medical provider or health care provider who committed malpractice or negligence/whose malpractice or negligence injured/hurt me? What is the medical malpractice or negligence presuit screening period? What is a notice of intent?
- What is the Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund? Can I get compensation from/compensated by the Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund?
- Do I need a lawyer for a medical malpractice case?
- What are the reforms that have been proposed for medical malpractice laws?
Recent Articles
Articles you view will appear here.